Supreme Court ruling on overseas divorces – Emily Brand comments
Written by
Yesterday’s Supreme Court judgment on applications for financial relief in Potanina v Potanin, following an overseas divorce has been described as ‘long overdue’ and ‘a warning that an application in this jurisdiction is not necessarily a meal ticket’. The case concerned whether the court should have granted the wife permission to apply for financial relief pursuant to Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. The majority judgment in Potanina v Potanin found the practice in dealing with application for leave under Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 flouted the essential requirement of procedural fairness.
In Today's Family Lawyer, Head of Family Law, Emily Brand comments: